TALIBANIZATION OF HINDUS--Isn't it laughable?

Dear Friends,



I would like to hear different voices about this much-used word. There has been a heavy usage of this phrase of late by hindu bashers, knowingly or unknowingly. Those people who spew venom at the mention of anything 'Hindu', have found a phrase that has the capability to carry the most venomous of abuses directed towards hindus. But there are some people who don't exactly hate hindus, but are compelled to use the phrase just to sound 'intellectual' (Isn't it true that ridiculing hinduism is mistakenly viewed as intellectuality in India?).



Okay my point here is, how on earth can a taliban (zehadists and other islamic militants also) equals a sanghparivar activist? Those who talk combining both are ridiculously ignorant of the facts on ground. Mighty America and its allies are fighting a losing battle against talibans whereas a few hindu uprisings in India are dealt with iron hand with ridiculous ease without consequential tremors. While zehadis are blood suckers and see absolutely no difference between a human life and an animals life (cows are slaughtered in thousands in India by muslims brushing aside the sentiments of the majority hindus especially when there are so called hindu terrorists who are instilling great fear in the minds of minorities), hindu activists do know what they are doing and oppose only those who provoke them.



They dont attack people just because they are of other religion whereas islamic militants mercilessly kill anybody who does not believe in islam. You shudder to think the aim of zehadis where as hindus only want to live peacefully in their own land. It is well known fact that every muslim feels it is his duty to convert or kill kafirs and help in establishing Islam in the whole world. Thats why no muslim condemns bomb blasts or blatant attacks by zehadis.